An interactive component of the exhibition will allow visitors to leave their own video “imprints,” and this collection will grow throughout the life of the exhibit to become the largest recorded oral history project in U.S. history.
And that got me thinking about the meaning of oral history.
Recording the impressions of museum visitors certainly creates an excellent video document that future scholars may find useful - but is it Oral History? Do we need more information about the narrators, greater context within which to understand their lives and their stories, in order to constitute an Oral History? Where does a project like StoryCorps fit in? Maybe we need a broader term for these multimedia primary-source documents we're preserving?
Ideas?
This blog post reflects the opinions of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of Brooklyn Public Library.
Post a Comment
While BPL encourages an open forum, posts and comments are moderated by library staff. BPL reserves the right, within its sole discretion, not to post and to remove submissions or comments that are unlawful or violate this policy. While comments will not be edited by BPL personnel, a comment may be deleted if it violates our comment policy.
eNews Signup
Get the latest updates from BPL and be the first to know about new programs, author talks, exciting events and opportunities to support your local library.